Here’s a sample of key findings from this year’s report based on a survey of 500 IT executives from around the world. Scroll to find out more about the current trend of ITAM usage statistics.
Five hundred technical professionals and executive leaders worldwide participated in the survey in the March of 2023. The network includes professionals across industries and context areas.
We encourage the reuse of data, charts and text published in this report under the terms of this Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You are free to share and make commercial use of this work as long as you attribute the Flexera 2023 State of ITAM Report.
High-functioning enterprises increasingly rely on ITAM practitioners to tackle new and evolving challenges. Saving money has increasingly become ITAM teams’ number one initiative, but new responsibilities don’t end there. FinOps teams, central cloud teams, security teams, ESG (environmental, social and governance) teams, ITSM teams and enterprise architecture teams are improving their business outcomes by leveraging data from ITAM teams and tools. Vendor audits are still top of mind for many organizations. However, regularly optimizing spend across cloud, on-premises and SaaS is shaving millions more off annual expenditures.
This year’s survey is weighted more heavily toward larger companies, with 89% of respondents in organizations with more than 2,000 employees and 14% in organizations with more than 50,000 employees.
More than half (60%) of respondents are from North America and one-third come from Europe, including the UK (21%), Germany (12%) and France (1%).
The ITAM function continues to broaden in response to the growth of FinOps, SaaS and cloud. There continues to be an increased focus on sustainability. For example, the ITAM function now includes ITAD (IT asset disposition)—safe, secure and environmentally responsible disposal of unused technological assets.
Nearly three-quarters of respondents work in ITAM (40%)
or IT infrastructure, operations or cloud (34%).
Forty percent of ITAM teams report to the CIO or CTO this year compared to 43% last year, and 29% report to infrastructure management.
A cloud center of excellence (CCOE), a centralized way to manage an organization’s cloud journey, remains the norm (73%), up slightly from 69% last year. CCOEs are becoming more centrally involved in digital transformation efforts.
have an ITAM/SAM member on the
team. The CCOE will have the most
exposure and influence on an
organization’s cloud journey.
Enterprises should include ITAM practitioners in their CCOEs to ensure that software licensing is incorporated into cloud cost planning and deployment.
SAM teams are critical and interact with teams across an enterprise. This year, a quarter of respondents interacted significantly with FinOps teams. Four in ten (40%) interacted with CIOs/CTOs, 42% with cloud teams and 52% with security teams.
Due to its growing popularity, FinOps is a new category
in the survey this year. Already 25% of SAM professionals
interact with FinOps teams.
report advanced SAM practices, including ongoing tracking, plus optimization of software licenses beyond just audits and tracking SaaS and cloud usage. There is a higher percentage of beginners this year at 27%, up from 24% last year.
As SaaS and cloud usage and their associated costs eclipse those of on-premises software, ITAM professionals must continue to increase their expertise and involvement in FinOps.
Tracking the use of software licenses on-premises is currently the most common activity for ITAM teams. Security was added to this year’s survey and immediately jumped near the top, with 61% providing data/analysis to support security. In the future, ITAM teams plan to focus on finding ways to optimize our use of software licenses based on use rights (44%), working to reclaim or reassign unused software licenses (41%), and tracking/optimizing IaaS and PaaS spending and usage (40%).
ITAM and SAM professionals should build strategies for sharing data and skills to help a broad set of processes ranging from FinOps to security.
As was the case last year, tracking the use of software licenses on-premises is the top responsibility for intermediate and advanced users, and responding to audits is second.
More than half of advanced users track the use of licenses in
SaaS (65%), public cloud (64%) and containers (56%).
Hardware asset management (HAM) remains less advanced than SAM. As previously discussed, 46% of SAM respondents do advanced activities, compared to 31% of HAM.
There is a need for ITAM teams to mature HAM processes to catch up with the more mature SAM processes.
Similar to last year, SAM teams reporting directly to the C-level have the broadest responsibilities. Teams reporting to vendor management are most likely to provide data/analysis to support ESG efforts (67%), and teams reporting to security are most likely to provide data/analysis to support security efforts (77%).
HAM teams saw a marked increase in cybersecurity responsibilities. For example, the discovery of devices in use was 90% this year for teams reporting to security, up from 63% last year.
Respondents estimated
36% of desktop software spend,
33% of data center spend,
32% of SaaS spend and
32% of IaaS/PaaS
spend are wasted.
ITAM professionals must focus more on desktop software as we move into a more permanent work-from-home/hybrid work environment.
Three in ten (31%) respondents said wasted spend was decreasing year over year with desktop software, while 33% said wasted spend was increasing with IaaS/PaaS.
ITAM challenges hinder organizations from recovering wasted spend. Dealing with SaaS, cloud and containers is a significant challenge (34%), as is gaining clear and comprehensive visibility into the IT estate (33%). More than eight in ten (83%) said finding ways to optimize software use is a challenge.
Enterprises should include ITAM practitioners in their CCOEs to ensure that software licensing is incorporated into cloud cost planning and deployment.
Audits are a challenge and can be costly, no matter the SAM team’s maturity level. However, beginners and advanced users struggle the most with new environments (SaaS, cloud, containers). Finding ways to optimize software use remains critical and a significant challenge across maturity levels.
SAM tools are becoming more effective and easier to use
for mature users, as 84% of advanced users don’t find using
them a challenge, compared to 71% of beginners.
Respondents still struggle to implement best practices for governing the use of SaaS and optimizing SaaS spending, with less than half tracking usage and rightsizing overall SaaS contracts (48%). More than half have linked all major SaaS applications to single sign-on (SSO) (55%).
SAM professionals expect SaaS software and cloud computing to drive the most significant change in focus over the next three years. Three-fourths (74%) expect an increased focus on SaaS, and 72% expect more focus on public cloud computing.
Optimizing spend is a top SAM initiative in 2023 (and was the top challenge in the Flexera 2023 State of the Cloud Report for the first time). Three in ten (31%) ranked optimizing cloud spending as the top initiative this year, compared to 28% last year. Less than half of respondents named improved reclamation of underused or unused software or improved management of SaaS products as a top three initiative.
Time spent supporting software publisher audits is down for the third straight year.
Time spent responding to publisher audits dropped to 18%,
compared to 24% last year and 27% the previous year.
As ITAM tools improve usability and provide deeper insights into the hybrid IT estate, time spent supporting audits will continue to decrease.
When asked to rate, on a scale from 1 to 5, how relevant technology providers are to a SAM program, respondents placed Microsoft in the top three spots: Microsoft licensed software (4.08), Microsoft SaaS products (4.08) and Microsoft Azure public cloud (3.7).
SAM teams continue to focus holistically on Microsoft, driven by Microsoft’s Enterprise Agreements.
Respondents reported an increase in the number of audits by Microsoft in the past three years (53%). During the same three-year period, a significant number of respondents reported having been audited by IBM (37%), Oracle (28%) and Adobe (25%).
Software audits continue to be very expensive. Fifteen percent of respondents said they paid more than $5 million in the past three years due to software vendor audits (up from 9% last year).
As a metric to measure success of SAM initiatives, cost avoidance increased the most. Last year, 41% said they used cost avoidance as a metric for SAM initiatives; this year that percentage rose to 46%. Other common ways to measure SAM initiatives include compliance with regulatory or internal audits (46%), audit compliance (45%) and hard savings on software (45%).
HAM programs are much more cost-focused this year. The top three measures of success for HAM teams are reduction in hardware purchases (45%), reduction in maintenance contract spend (42%) and reduction in facility costs (37%). HAM initiatives are also measuring carbon footprint more, increasing from 25% last year to 30% this year.
Nearly one-third of HAM programs measure carbon footprint.
SAM programs are saving tens of millions of dollars. Over half (55%) of respondents saved more than $1 million, and 16% of respondents claim SAM programs saved more than $10 million in the past year.
$25+ million in savings—One in ten companies with active SAM programs claim savings of more than $25 million in the past year.
SAM programs were most successful in realizing savings through better negotiation of vendor contracts (85%), reduction of maintenance spend on unused software (85%) and reuse of licenses to avoid buying new ones (non-cloud) (87%). Audit-related initiatives were slightly less successful at realizing actual savings.
respondents find savings through the reuse of licenses to avoid buying new ones (non-cloud).
Advanced SAM teams are focusing on license optimization more this year (91%) than last year (84%). Beginner teams focus more on better vendor contract negotiation (89% this year, 81% last year).
As ITAM and FinOps tools and processes improve, there’s an increase in respondents who have visibility into their IT estate. Complete visibility improved from 35% last year to 39% this year. Still, 61% of respondents said they don’t have complete visibility into IT assets that impact business outcomes.
As organizations increase their use of transient assets such as cloud instances or containers, they must reassess their IT asset tracking procedures to ensure their CMDBs don’t become bloated with outdated and irrelevant entries.
CMDBs continue to track broader assets: Almost two-thirds (64%) track on-premises VMs, 62% track private cloud instances and 61% track public cloud instances. Thirty-eight percent track containers in their CMDB.
Respondents are most likely to export data from asset management tools into enterprise systems or CMDBs such as ServiceNow (57%), BMC (32%), Apptio (13%) and Cherwell (12%).
Having high-quality data on IT estates improves the performance of other platforms and teams, including security, enterprise architecture and CMDBs.
This year’s survey is weighted more heavily toward larger European companies, with 88% of respondents in organizations having more than 2,000 employees. Almost a quarter (24%) are in organizations with more than 20,000 employees.
In this year’s survey, Europe has more beginners (30% to 21% in North America), and North America has more advanced users (52% to 43% in Europe).
As with the global survey, many ITAM teams report directly to the CIO/CTO. In Europe, this number was 48% (up from 44% last year). Reporting to the CIO/CTO provides more visibility within the organization and ability to accomplish goals.
European ITAM teams are most likely to interact with IT service management (67%), infrastructure and operations (62%) and CIOs/CTOs (41%). Three in ten (30%) European teams interact with FinOps teams, compared to 25% globally.
Currently, SAM teams in Europe focus on a broad set of activities, including tracking the use of software licenses on-premises (68%), responding to audits (63%), software discovery (59%), and providing data to security and ESG teams (also 59% each).
SAM tools and teams are increasingly becoming critical for organizational ESG and security initiatives.
SAM challenges were different this year over last year's in Europe. Challenges around software vendor use rights jumped to the top spot this year (87% called it a challenge); time/money spent on audits (80%) dropped to sixth place.
Similar to the global pool of respondents, optimizing and finding savings in software spend is a top initiative this year.
Similar to the global survey, respondents in Europe have been audited the most by Microsoft (55%), IBM (49%) and Oracle (29%) over the past three years. European respondents reported more IBM audits (49% in Europe compared to 37% globally).
As is the case globally, cost avoidance is increasing as a measurement for SAM initiative success, growing to 49% this year over 43% last year. Compliance with regulatory or internal audits remains the top measurement at 50%.
As with global respondents, the most savings (89% for Europe, 87% from global) came from the reuse of on-premises licenses. However, European respondents saw even more savings across all categories than their global counterparts. Europeans also saw an increase in the reuse of on-premises licenses in public cloud (often called bring your own license, or BYOL, 77% last year to 84% this year), with a jump from 29% to 36% in the significant category.
We are seeing a greater focus on corporate efficiencies around the globe. ITAM professionals find themselves at the nexus of a number of key enterprise initiatives, including cost savings, FinOps, security and even ESG programs tracking carbon emissions. This is putting more pressure on ITAM teams to stay nimble and flexible, and manage a single source of truth for IT data and insights.