Proper IT asset management is foundational to managing your hybrid IT estate, but it comes with its own set of unique challenges. It’s an essential process that enables organizations to optimize their IT assets by improving performance, mitigating security risks and reducing costs. However, ITAM tools and processes are evolving quickly as the IT landscape becomes more complex across hybrid on-premises, SaaS and the cloud.
Organizations are dealing with a noticeable increase in the cost of software audits. At the same time, a wide range of stakeholders use data from ITAM platforms, including security, procurement, FinOps and finance. The Flexera 2024 State of ITAM Report provides insight into the makeup and focus of ITAM teams at enterprise-level organizations and offers perspective and advice on current trends. The report takes a high-level view of IT investments across public, hybrid and SaaS technologies.
Here’s a sample of key findings from this year’s report, which represent trends in ITAM, based on a worldwide survey of 503 IT professionals.
The Flexera State of ITAM survey tapped 503 technical professionals worldwide in early 2024. The network includes professionals across industries and context areas.
Flexera sources participants from an independent panel that is rigorously maintained and is comprised of vetted respondents with detailed profiles. All numbers and percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
At numerous points throughout the report, we’ve provided our own interpretation of the data as Flexera points of view (POV).
We encourage the reuse of data, charts and text published in this report under the terms of this Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You are free to share and use this work commercially as long as you provide attribution to the Flexera 2024 State of ITAM Report as stipulated in the terms of the license.
Commonly used terms:
BYOL: Bring your own license
CCOE: Cloud center of excellence
CMDB: Configuration management database
ESG: Environmental, social and governance
EOL/EOS: End of life/end of service
HAM: Hardware asset management
IaaS: Infrastructure as a service
ITAD: IT asset disposition
ITAM: IT asset management
ITFM: IT financial management
ITSM: IT service management
PaaS: Platform as a service
SaaS: Software as a service
SAM: Software asset management
This year’s survey is weighted heavily toward larger companies; 91% of respondents were from organizations with more than 2,000 employees and 11% were from organizations with more than 50,000 employees.
More than half (58%) of the respondents are from North America, and one-third come from the UK (22%), Germany (7%) or France (4%).
Financial services (22%), tech: software (13%) and healthcare (11%) are the most prominent industries represented.
The ITAM function continues to broaden in response to the growth of FinOps, SaaS and the cloud. The top two respondent job functions remained the same year over year: ITAM (ITAM, SAM, HAM, ITAD) and IT infrastructure/operations/cloud. IT infrastructure/operations/cloud was down from 34% last year, and IT service management increased to 5% this year, up from 1% last year.
Nearly three-quarters of respondents describe their function as ITAM or IT infrastructure, operations or cloud
69%
of respondents
are manager level
or higher
23%
are VP level
or higher
Almost half of respondents (46%) say that their ITAM teams now report directly to the CIO or CTO, up from 40% last year and 22% in 2022.
ITAM has become more strategic. Over the past two years, the percentage of ITAM teams reporting directly to the CIO or CTO has more than doubled
CCOEs are a centralized way to manage an organization’s cloud journey. Respondents indicate this remains the norm (72%), similar to last year.
88%
of CCOEs have an ITAM/SAM member on the
team. The CCOE will have the most exposure and
influence on an organization’s cloud
journey
Enterprises should include ITAM practitioners in CCOEs to ensure software licensing is incorporated into cloud-cost planning and deployment.
77%
of respondents’ organizations
have a FinOps team
SAM teams are an essential component of any organization, and they interact with teams across an enterprise. This year, 32% of SAM teams interacted with FinOps teams, up from 25% last year. Interactions with the CIO/CTO increased to 44% from 40% last year. Fifty percent of SAM teams interact with security teams, similar to last year.
Forty-one percent of respondents report advanced SAM practices, including ongoing tracking plus optimization of software licenses beyond just audits as well as tracking SaaS and cloud usage.
This year’s survey had an increase in beginner respondents, up to 39% from 27% last year
ITAM is no longer an option as additional regulations and mandates continue to emerge, requiring better visibility and control of IT assets. As SaaS and cloud usage and costs eclipse that of on-premises software, ITAM professionals should continue increasing their collaboration with FinOps teams.
ITAM teams encompass a broad set of responsibilities. More than half of ITAM and SAM professionals claim nine different responsibilities, including tracking usage of SaaS (56%), providing data/analysis to support security (56%), preparing for software vendor contract renewals (58%) and maintaining an accurate inventory of licensed software use (72%).
Responding to audits jumped to the most common activity for ITAM teams this year (74% compared to 66% YoY). Tracking the use of software licenses on-premises dropped to 61% from 70% YoY. This could be tied to this year’s report’s increased percentage of beginner respondents.
Responding to audits increased year over year (YoY) no matter the maturity level. Advanced users reported an increase from 74% last year to 78% this year; intermediate users rose from 67% to 75%; and beginners increased from 52% to 70%. This year, the most significant delta between beginners and advanced practitioners was tracking the use of software licenses on- premises: 44% of beginners named this a responsibility, compared to 74% of advanced users.
Almost two thirds (63%) of advanced users track the use of licenses in the public cloud
The growth in audit-based responsibilities indicates that audits are becoming a higher priority, even as SAM professionals are also expected to help with processes ranging from FinOps to security.
HAM practices and processes are maturing. Thirty-nine percent of respondents are advanced HAM users (tracking inventory, deployment, firmware EOL/EOS, sustainability requirements), which is close to the 41% of respondents who reported advanced SAM practices or similar.
HAM teams are maturing and catching up to historically more mature SAM counterparts.
Discovering and inventorying assets remain the top priorities for HAM practitioners. Tracking lifecycles of hardware assets dropped slightly YoY, as did tracking warranty or maintenance.
As previously mentioned, the highest percentage of ITAM teams report to the CIO/CTO (46%), infrastructure management teams (25%), and operations teams (14%).
For SAM teams reporting to the CIO/CTO, cost-related activities such as responding to audits (67% to 71% YoY) and tracking usage of SaaS (52% to 57% YoY) increased.
HAM teams reporting on the discovery of devices in use saw a sizeable YoY gain when reporting to the CIO/CTO (72% compared to 65% YoY) as well as when reporting to infrastructure management (82% from 66% YoY).
Wasted IT spend is improving compared to prior years but remains a challenge. Not surprisingly, beginner teams see higher rates of wasted spend.
Forty-one percent of respondents said wasted SaaS spend increased from 33% last year, and 37% said wasted IaaS/PaaS increased, compared to 33% last year.
41%
of respondents said wasted
SaaS increased over the past year
Thirty-seven percent of respondents named finding ways to optimize software use as a significant challenge (up from 31% YoY), whereas 36% indicated their biggest issue was dealing with new environments and 35% said it was the complexity of software vendor use rights.
Tools and processes are helping to find assets, but optimizing software costs is challenging as vendor use rights and software bundles become more complex.
The most common SAM challenge for beginners is the amount of time/money spent responding to audits (45%). For intermediate and advanced users, dealing with new environments (SaaS, cloud, containers) is the most common challenge (45% and 37%, respectively).
SAM tools have become more accessible and practical. Eighty-nine percent of advanced users don’t find difficulty in using SAM tools
More than half of respondents manage SaaS by tracking usage by SaaS users and rightsizing their subscription level (57%), linking all major SaaS apps to single sign-on (SSO) (52%), and tracking usage and rightsizing overall SaaS contracts (52%). The most significant drop this year was in negotiating contract terms with software vendors, which decreased significantly from 50% to 32% YoY.
Processes and practices for tracking usage are increasing, but the massive YoY drop in negotiating contract terms with software vendors represents an opportunity for significant savings through negotiations.
Over the next three years, SAM professionals expect their focus to increase significantly on SaaS solutions (38%) and use of the public cloud (38%). On-premises software is declining (19% of respondents reported a decline in focus on data center software, and 18% reported a decline in focus on desktop software). SaaS solutions, use of public cloud and IoT all decreased significantly by 1%.”
The focus on finding savings within software spend continues to gain traction. Optimizing and finding savings in software spend (36%), expanding the number of vendors we cover (24%) and improving reclamation of underused or unused software (20%) are the top three initiatives that respondents want to progress on.
SAM practices’ focus on improving SaaS management in the next twelve months has increased YoY from 10% to 18%
Almost all (95%) organizations have some plan for aging hardware. Sixty-three percent plan on recycling, 53% plan on longer retention periods, 51% plan to refurbish/reuse hardware and 46% plan to utilize product takebacks (return to vendor for disposal). (Note that respondents could select more than one option.)
95%
of companies have defined sustainability policies for hardware assets
Respondents indicated the highest percentage of SAM teams’ time is spent on collaboration with non-ITAM internal stakeholders (22%). More than half of their time (55%) is still spent on internal, regulatory and publisher audit-related activities.
Despite growing complexity, as advanced ITAM tools improve usability and allow deeper insights into the hybrid IT estate, time spent supporting publisher audits should decrease.
When asked to rate, on a scale from 1 to 5, how relevant technologies are to a SAM program, Microsoft had
the top three spots with Microsoft licensed software (3.97), Microsoft SaaS products (3.95) and Microsoft Azure public cloud (3.71).
SAM teams continue to focus holistically on Microsoft, most likely driven by Microsoft’s Enterprise Agreements.
Microsoft, IBM and Oracle are the most likely to have audited respondents in the past three years. Microsoft was down slightly YoY (50% from 53%), and IBM and Oracle increased slightly (IBM is up to 42% from 37% YoY; Oracle is up to 31% from 28% YoY). Twenty percent of respondents reported a ServiceNow audit this year, a new addition to the vendor list.
50%
of respondents reported at least one Microsoft audit in the past three years
Software audits continue to become more expensive. Twenty-two percent of respondents said they paid more than $5 million due to software vendor audits over the last three years (up from 15% in 2023 and 9% in 2022). The number of organizations spending more than $10 million nearly doubled (from 7% to 12% YoY).
The top three metrics for measuring the success of SAM initiatives are audit compliance, hard savings on software and compliance with regulatory or internal audits, which are all tied at 47%.
This year, HAM programs are much more focused on costs. The top three measures of success for HAM teams are a reduction in hardware purchases (50%), maintenance contract spend (43%) and facility costs (36%). Twenty-nine percent of HAM initiatives measure their organization’s carbon footprint.
Nearly one-third of HAM programs are measuring
their organization’s carbon footprint
SAM programs were most successful in realizing savings through reuse of licenses to avoid buying new ones (non-cloud), better negotiation of vendor contracts and the reduction of maintenance spend on unused software.
91%
of respondents find savings by reusing licenses to avoid buying new ones (non-cloud)
Beginner, intermediate and advanced SAM teams generate the most savings via the reuse of licenses to avoid
buying new ones (non-cloud).
This year’s report showed that approximately two-thirds of respondents feel they have an accurate view of their on-premises software (67%), on-premises hardware (65%) and cloud instances (64%). SaaS usage has less visibility (54%), and most respondents don’t feel confident in their BYOL positioning (19%).
Maturing collaboration between ITAM and FinOps will drive more efficiencies in the coming years and illuminate the significant visibility gap regarding licenses for software running in the cloud.
Nearly half (47%) of respondents say they have complete visibility into IT assets and impact on business outcomes, whereas 51% say somewhat.
As ITAM and FinOps tools and processes are widely adopted, we expect the percentage of respondents with complete visibility into their IT assets to continue to grow.
More than three-quarters of respondents use CMDBs
As organizations increase their use of transient assets—such as cloud instances and containers—they must reassess their IT asset tracking procedures to ensure their CMDBs don’t become bloated with outdated entries.
Organizations are continuing to use CMDBs to track broader assets. Sixty-six percent track private cloud instances, 64% on-premises virtual machines (VMs) and 61% public cloud instances.
Respondents are most likely to export data from asset management tools into enterprise systems or CMDBs such as ServiceNow (61%), BMC (36%), Cherwell (13%) and Apptio (10%).
Having high-quality data about your IT estate is essential to the performance of your organization. Teams such as security or enterprise architecture depend upon data accuracy just as much as platforms like CMDBs do.
In Europe, this year’s survey is weighted more heavily toward larger companies. Ninety percent of European respondents are in organizations with more than 2,000 employees, and 19% are in organizations with more than 20,000 workers.
In this year’s survey, Europe had more beginners (50% as opposed to 31% in North America), and North America had more advanced users (47% versus 34% in Europe).
As with the global survey, many European ITAM teams report directly to the CIO or CTO (44%). Reporting to the CIO/CTO enables more visibility within the organization and the ability to accomplish goals.
79%
of European respondents’ organizations have a FinOps team, compared to 77% globally
In Europe, 66% of respondents claim SAM teams have significant interaction with infrastructure and operations, 63% with IT service management and 48% with security. These numbers are similar to those of global respondents.
Currently, European SAM teams focus on a broad set of activities, including responding to audits (73%), maintaining an accurate usage inventory of licensed software (71%) and discovering software in use (69%).
European respondents indicate that the top three challenges include a lack of resources on the SAM team, finding ways to optimize software use and increasing the maturity of their SAM practice.
Similar to global findings, optimizing and finding savings in software spend is a top initiative for European respondents this year, with 41% ranking it as their top initiative. Last year, only 22% said it was their top initiative.
The significant increase in European respondents taking the initiative to optimize and find opportunities to save on software spend underscores the importance of prioritizing cost-saving initiatives.
Much as with the global results, European survey respondents have been audited the most by IBM (49%), Microsoft (45%), Oracle (32%) and SAP (32%) over the past three years. European respondents reported more IBM audits than what is reflected in global results (49% in Europe compared to 42% globally).
Hard savings on software is the most used success metric in Europe (51%), followed by audit compliance (47%) and cost avoidance (43%).
As with global respondents, the most savings (92%) came from the reuse of licenses to avoid buying
new ones (non-cloud).
The Flexera 2024 State of ITAM Report highlights the pivotal role of cross-team collaboration for ITAM teams this year.
Software audits remain a significant expense, with 22% of respondents reporting more than $5 million over the previous three years in audit costs, nearly double the percentage from just two years prior. Responding to these audits has become the top initiative for ITAM teams reporting to the CIO or CTO. Major vendors like Oracle, IBM and ServiceNow have also increased their audit activities.
At the same time, ITAM professionals are increasingly realizing they own data that can help teams across the organization, including FinOps, security and ITSM. ITAM teams are intensifying their interactions across the enterprise—32% of teams engaged with FinOps this year, up from 25% in the previous year. Connections with the C-suite remained steady at 44%, linking with the CIO/CTO. ITAM data is commonly exported to enterprise systems like ServiceNow, BMC, Cherwell and Apptio. However, ITAM responsibilities are broad, with more than half of professionals claiming ownership for tracking SaaS usage, providing security analysis, preparing for contract renewals and maintaining software licensing inventories. ITAM teams must continue to stay nimble and flexible, managing a comprehensive view of data with actionable insights.